Rachel Small's picture

Gay Couples Struggle Over Support Issues

Posted to Relevant News by Rachel Small on Tue, 01/08/2008 - 1:00pm

"One of the benefits of marriage is divorce," says, Joyce Kauffman, a lawyer who handles same-sex divorce in Massachusetts. She has made some incisive observations about what gay and lesbian married couples go through to achieve a divorce. When these couples split up, they run into barriers of institutional discrimination not experienced by heterosexual couples or in any other area of the law.

Yesterday, we talked about custody issues. Child support in a lesbian divorce action becomes a problem in situations where the former wife has not adopted the children of the biological mother. Without a legal or biological connection, the custodial parent was unable to collect child support. Kauffman strongly advises each party to adopt each other's children so gay couples would be in a similar legal position as straight couples in seeking child support.

Alimony is another area where same-sex couples are treated differently. In Massachusetts, there is equality in marriage for all, but those laws are not applicable in other states, nor at the federal level. Under IRS rules, alimony paid by a heterosexual to an ex-spouse is tax deductible, but the same rules do not apply to same-sex couples, even though they were legally married.

To me, this is unfair and discriminatory. Why should the federal government, the tax office no less, determine that gay alimony is different from straight alimony? This amounts to government sanctioned discrimination rationalized on the basis that their marriages are not recognized by the feds. As divorce attorney David Epperly put it, "federal law looks at gay divorcées as strangers."

Since gay marriage is so new, courts haven't much, if any, precedent, to follow in enforcing equal rights. Gay marriages in Massachusetts are legal and yet it is problematic for those who moved to another state and then seek a divorce. The rest of the states refuse divorces based on the federal "Defense of Marriage Act," passed in 1996. States need to reassess their positions in recognizing gay marriages in order to provide gay and lesbian married couples the right to divorce. I still say it is a constitutional issue of full faith and credit which means states must recognize Massachusetts marriages, regardless of the opinions of the leaders or residents of those states.

Click here for more.

Reply

comment as "Guest"
if you wish to remain anonymous.
Your information will be kept private.
sign in
if you are already registered, sign in to comment.
no spaces
Lowercase letters only, no spaces.