

What can we learn from serial celebrity break-ups, billionaire bust-ups, misbehaving spouses, pants-on challenged politicos and the ever-shifting landscape of divorce law? Question is, "What CAN'T we learn"? With latte in hand and clicky finger at the ready, dive in for the best in divorce news, views, gossip, and buzz – assembled below for your reading pleasure.
Our current contributors are Jill Brooke, Maureen Dempsey, Naomi Dunn, and Linda Lee.

The Sydney Morning Herald reported recently that Australians are divorcing less than they did six years ago.
Today's divorce rate of 2.5 per 1,000 people is down slightly from 2.9 per 1,000 in 2001.
I'm not sure this is good news, as fewer divorces doesn't mean more long-term happy unions.
The slight decline in Australia — and in the U.S. — is due to several factors:
Still, one in three Australian marriages end in divorce. The most likely divorce candidates are in marriages just over twelve years, men aged 40-44, and women 35-39.
For men it may be a mid-life crisis: they aren't achieving their life goals, and seek new adventures with younger partners. A third of all Australian divorces occur in marriages of five years or less.
While Australian divorces follow the same trend of Western countries, the U.S. still has the highest rate of divorce. Despite a slight decline, the U.S. rate is between 40-50% of marriages. Experts believe that young people marrying for the first time are at the greatest risk for divorce during the first five years of marriage.
In the U.S., marriage rates have declined almost 50% since 1970, from 76.5 per 1,000 to 39.9 per 1,000, at the end of 2006. In 2005, 51% of women were living without a spouse. Women and men are waiting longer to marry.
You may think cohabitation is the way out if you want to avoid divorce, but it's not sure-fire: co-habiting couples have twice the break up rate of married couples. (We just don't call it a divorce.)
In the end, there is only one sure-fire way to avoid divorce: Don't get married.
read more »
Dr. Janet Belsky, Professor of Psychology and an expert on life span development suggests that the 50/50 divorce ratio in the U.S. is leaning more in favor of marital success than it did before. She attributes this to an aging population, since people tend to divorce when they are younger.
I'm not so sure about this: We hear of many divorces taking place after 25 years, when children have left home. Research cited in the New York Times, however, shows about 60% of all divorces occur during the first decade of marriage.
There also seems to be a correlation between divorce and education. Data shows that the divorce rate for college graduates during the first 10 years of marriage dropped to 16% for those married between 1990 and 1994.
When Dr. Belsky polled her students at Middle Tennessee State University, she found that 50% had divorced parents and grew up in single-parent homes. Students, well aware of the divorce statistics, express an unwillingness to marry at a young age, preferring to put off marriage until they're well-established in their career. Marriage comes last as an "adult transition," sometimes after the decision to have children.
Divorce rates may be affected as people postpone marriage; it's true that waiting to marry may result in lower chances of getting married. If fewer people marry, it's likely to affect divorce rates.
I'm not so sure, though, about the aging population explanation. I just don't believe that getting married in later life necessarily results in fewer divorces.
Whatever the reason, if the divorce rate is really leveling off, it's a good thing. What do you think?
Click here to read more.