Header

What can we learn from serial celebrity break-ups, billionaire bust-ups, misbehaving spouses, pants-on challenged politicos and the ever-shifting landscape of divorce law? Question is, "What CAN'T we learn"? With latte in hand and clicky finger at the ready, dive in for the best in divorce news, views, gossip, and buzz – assembled below for your reading pleasure.

Our current contributors are Jill Brooke, Maureen Dempsey, Naomi Dunn, and Linda Lee.

Letting a Spouse Go

Posted by Eve Miller on Mon, 06/04/2007 - 7:49am

I know there are a lot reasons men and women don’t agree to a divorce when one partner wants to leave. I wish that wasn’t the case. I wish they’d just let their partner go.

Disclosures last week about Carl Bernstein’s book on Hillary Clinton which alleges that she refused to give Bill a divorce, got me thinking about the topic.

According to Bernstein, Hillary was worried about being a single parent. She also, apparently, had come to terms with Clinton’s tendency to stray before they wed, which is one of the reasons she married him.

I personally know of a few couples with similar situations where one wanted to leave and the other wouldn’t agree.

In one case, the husband of a female friend of mine won’t let her leave. From the things she tells me, he behaves like a sadistic, control freak and it sounds like he gets pleasure out of her unhappiness. (Many of their marital troubles revolve around his lack of ethics in his business, lying and putting his family in a precarious financial position).

I know of other cases that are less complicated, but have to do with economics, where the wife is fearful her husband won’t continue to contribute to the household if they separate.

What makes me the saddest though, is when women don’t let their husbands leave because they’re afraid to be alone. Maybe they can’t imagine not being with their husbands or they think they love their man too much to let him go, or perhaps they have low self-esteem.

I would hate to think someone was staying with me out of obligation, or worse, because I begged him not to leave. Letting the man who wants to leave, go, is probably the hardest thing to do, but it’s also one of the kindest things we can do for ourselves.

 

We’ve heard that when men fall in love, they fall harder than women, and that males are generally happier being married than females.

However, a new study out of Canada finds that men who had divorced or separated were six times more likely to report an episode of depression than men who remained married. Also, the rate of depression for men surpasses the rate for women. In fact, men were three and a half times more likely to have been depressed than women who were still in relationships.

Perhaps, but what the statistics don’t say is which sex initiated the breakup among these respondents. If it was split 50/50, the numbers are telling. Personally, I’ve seen both reactions, that of deep depression more devastating than the wife’s, and the reverse situation from the same man.

I was a close observer of a highly masculine, very handsome, charismatic charmer who was thrilled to finally separate from his wife to be with his longtime mistress full-time. Unfaithful, (that’s what I call him), was married to her for over a decade, had two children with her but was never “in love” with her, he said, and later grew to dislike her intensely. He couldn’t stand to be with his wife any longer, but I never knew for sure if his then-girlfriend had also pressured him to leave.

Unfaithful and mistress were married immediately. They were both deeply in love and had been for years. And truth be told, she was more suited to him than wife No. 1. Frankly, I thought his second marriage would last, but she walked out on him after 15 years.

He was angry and broken-hearted. A six-foot tall wounded bird so deeply depressed, he confessed to me he considered suicide until he started taking antidepressants and running around looking for women and sex again after a month or two.

read more »

Divorce, Abortion and the Lack of Choice

Posted by Eve Miller on Fri, 05/11/2007 - 10:55am
Conservative author Fred Hutchinson advances the notion that a married couple is more likely to divorce if it aborts a pregnancy. Part of the reason, he said, is because “any human attempt to change the nature of marriage has harmful consequences for the family.”

Granted, abortion and divorce are against the teachings of the Catholic Church, and even those who are pro-choice tend to think about abortion in the context of single women.

Nonetheless, just as anti-abortionists categorize an unwed female who has an abortion as hedonistic, immoral and consciousness, Hutchinson assumes the same about a married couple that aborts a child, implying it views the child as an inconvenience.

There are many reasons a single woman might choose to undergo an abortion, from rape to youth and inexperience. But it’s a decision that most women don’t take lightly, even minority 15-year-old high school girls, says my friend who teaches in a New York City public school.

Likewise, conservatives should take note that if a married couple aborts a pregnancy, it’s not necessarily because they’re a couple of swingers heading down the road to hell. In fact, I know couples who have, out of necessity, had abortions—and not without heartache.

Family friends of mine, a middle-class couple, I recently found out, aborted a pregnancy. At the time, they already had three young children. Yes, money was extremely tight, but the reason they didn’t have the child was because the wife was experiencing emotional difficulties at the time. She was on medication, but even still, one more infant would have put her over the edge. That could have had terrible consequences for the three children they already had, and most surely would have hurt their marriage much more than an abortion.

read more »