<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.firstwivesworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>firstwivesworld - Friends With What Sort of Benefits? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resource/resource-articles/andrea-nemerson/friends-what-sort-benefits</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Friends With What Sort of Benefits?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>To each his own- you just</title>
 <link>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resource/resource-articles/andrea-nemerson/friends-what-sort-benefits#comment-4550</link>
 <description>To each his own- you just have to be honest with each other. If you can&#039;t talk about the sex you are having, and what you expect from it,  then you shouldn&#039;t be having it at all... CM</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:39:54 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4550 at http://www.firstwivesworld.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Friends With What Sort of Benefits?</title>
 <link>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resource/resource-articles/andrea-nemerson/friends-what-sort-benefits</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I ran a little piece here not long ago called &amp;quot;In Defense Of The One-Night Stand,&amp;quot; making the point that sex, love, and intimacy are three related but disparate states, and that you don&#039;t have to have all three in play in order to make a satisfying connection with someone.  Unless you do, of course.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are a lot of us who &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; need to have all three at once or risk feeling used, hollow, dirty, or just plain lonely. Especially in the dispiriting aftermath of divorce, I think one ignores that need at one&#039;s peril:  If you are feeling vulnerable, wounded, and betrayed, it is no time to go prove how tough you are by hooking up with strangers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What if they&#039;re not strangers, though? The current phrase &amp;quot;friends with benefits&amp;quot; seems to have replaced the older, crasser, and yet less coldly transactional-sounding &amp;quot;f_ck buddies,&amp;quot; but we all know what we&#039;re talking about, right? There&#039;s this guy, you like each other and there&#039;s mutual attraction, and you seem compatible enough in bed.  So, once a week, or a month, or a &lt;i&gt;year&lt;/i&gt; if you&#039;re wired that way, you get together and have fun and part friends ‘til next time, or so it&#039;s supposed to go.  By either name, it&#039;s a functional enough arrangement when everybody has exactly the same degree of attachment (or, ideally, &lt;i&gt;de&lt;/i&gt;-tachment).  But the tightrope walking!  The potential misunderstandings! The oh-so-delicate balance between &amp;quot;just&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;friends!&amp;quot; So few people can really finesse it and, failing that, it&#039;s often just another way to cause ourselves pain and disappointment—two things we don&#039;t need more of after a divorce, thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resource/resource-articles/andrea-nemerson/friends-what-sort-benefits&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resource/resource-articles/andrea-nemerson/friends-what-sort-benefits#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce">divorce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/love">love</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/one-night-stand">one night stand</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/sex">sex</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/stages/sex-and-love">Sex and Love</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/moving-beyond-divorce">Moving Beyond Divorce</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:42:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Andrea Nemerson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5751 at http://www.firstwivesworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
