<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.firstwivesworld.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>firstwivesworld - Divorces Of The Rich And Sneaky - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/divorces-the-rich-and-sneaky</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Divorces Of The Rich And Sneaky&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Divorces Of The Rich And Sneaky</title>
 <link>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/divorces-the-rich-and-sneaky</link>
 <description> &lt;p&gt;Most people cynically believe that well-connected, rich or politically powerful people are given favorable treatment in many instances. And in this case, they might be onto something. Political and personal connections paid off for Georgia state House Speaker, &lt;b&gt;Glenn Richardson&lt;/b&gt;, in his recent quickie divorce.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the same afternoon, his divorce case was filed, a hearing was held in private, and a final decree of divorce was granted by a judge who had been a partner in Richardson&#039;s law firm. This was done despite state law calling for a 30-day waiting period before a divorce becomes final. The case documents were ordered sealed immediately, with no time limit, to protect the couple and their three children. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Georgia law requires a hearing on which documents should be sealed and for how long. The facts will be kept from public scrutiny of the press and researchers. Another irregularity was the side-stepping of the judge who, through rotation, should&#039;ve heard the case. Some observers feel that Richardson was able to select his judge, a friend and former partner, who would hear the case in chambers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The frenzy swirling around this divorce began last year when Georgia democrats filed an ethics complaint against the Pepublican Speaker, alleging he had an &amp;quot;inappropriate relationship with a lobbyist&amp;quot; at the same time as he was cosponsoring legislation that would benefit her employer. This complaint was dismissed by a committee of the Legislature. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/divorces-the-rich-and-sneaky&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/divorces-the-rich-and-sneaky#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce">divorce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce-community">divorce community</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce-law">divorce law</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce-legal">divorce legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/divorce-news">divorce news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/tags/navigating-divorce">navigating divorce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/stages/all-things-legal">All Things Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.firstwivesworld.com/summary/all/navigating-divorce">Navigating Divorce</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rachel Small</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">5409 at http://www.firstwivesworld.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
