firstwivesworld - The Frozen Embryo Thaw - Comments https://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/the-frozen-embryo-thaw Comments for "The Frozen Embryo Thaw" en How awful! Always read the https://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/the-frozen-embryo-thaw#comment-2054 <p>How awful! Always read the fine print... what a terrible situation. I'm curious how it pans out. Is the ex appealing just to spite her?</p> <p>CM</p> Tue, 28 Aug 2007 18:03:55 -0400 Guest comment 2054 at https://www.firstwivesworld.com The Frozen Embryo Thaw https://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/the-frozen-embryo-thaw In Texas, a divorced woman has lost her legal battle for three frozen embryos which are destined to be destroyed.<p>Here's the gist of it: Augusta Roman tried for several years to have a child before resorting to fertility treatments. The day before the embryos were to be implanted, her husband, Randy, told her he wanted to wait until they had resolved their problems. After six months of counseling, they divorced.</p><p>The dispute escalated as the fertility lab consent form clearly stated that in the event of divorce, the embryos would not be implanted and would be discarded. Augusta sued and was granted control of the embryos in the Trial Court but her husband appealed the case; the Appeals Court unanimously reversed the lower court. Augusta then appealed to the Texas Supreme Court which recently refused to hear the appeal, thus upholding the Appellate Court's decision.</p><p>The case raises a moral and legal dilemma for August, 45, who regards the embryos as her unborn children. She said she would sign away any support responsibility for the divorced husband. Her attorney attempted to distinguish this consent form from an enforceable contract.</p><p>While I commiserate with Augusta's sincere desire to become a mother, it would be bad public policy to ignore the clear meaning of the consent form. In fact, the form had an option, if chosen by both parties, for releasing the embryos to either spouse. But neither made that choice and instead, checked the option to discard the embryos.</p><p>Andy didn't want a child after the divorce and even though Texas law protects anonymous sperm donors from child support, this is a different case. There is legal precedent for sperm donors to be liable for support. Family courts could award financial support despite the waiver by the wife.</p><p><a href="https://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/the-frozen-embryo-thaw">read more</a></p> https://www.firstwivesworld.com/relevant-news/rachel-small/the-frozen-embryo-thaw#comments all things legal divorce community divorce news family court health and body kids and family moving beyond divorce navigating divorce Health and Body Kids and Family All Things Legal Navigating Divorce Moving Beyond Divorce Tue, 28 Aug 2007 12:05:33 -0400 Rachel Small 1448 at https://www.firstwivesworld.com